Literary Elements and Time Setting in Ethan Frome Essay -- essays rese

Ethan FromeLove does not always have happy endings. People can fall in and out of love as easily as changing clothes. Ethan Frome, a novel by Edith Wharton, explains how a married man named Ethan struggles on with his life, secretly distract by the yearning for his wifes cousin, Mattie Silver. The author uses literary elements and time setting in the story.Wharton has been generous in using literary elements in the novel. She has put together senses of incarnation and similies to thoroughly describe the plot of the story. In personifying the kitchen ornaments, the author uses ...-were hastily refreshing themselves at one corner of the supper-table which aligned its devastated pie dishes and ice cream saucers on the broadcast at the end of the hall. In this selection, Whar...

Edgar Allen Poes The Black Cat, The Tell-Tale Heart and The Cask of Am

Edgar Allen Poes The Black Cat, The Tell-Tale Heart and The Cask of AmontilladoIn each of Edgar Allen Poes stories of murder and madness, he takes us deep d consume the mind of the murderer from the time he begins until after the deed has been done. Poe gives us a point of view not common in works of horror and suspense the killers. We read the thoughts and follow the actions of the killer as he plots and follows through with his victim?s demise. All three of his stories are alike, especi bothy The Black Cat and The Tell-Tale Heart. However, I found that The Cask of Amontillado differ more than any of the other two from each other. While the murderers in The Black Cat and The Tell-Tale Heart are motivated by their own insanity, the character in The Cask of Amontillado is driven by pure, old-fashioned revenge and jealousy. A couple main details I noticed about all three tales is that each story is told in start-off person, and all of the main characters are male. Also, in the en d of each of these short stories all workforce felon out to be no better, if not much worse, than they already were.The ?Tell-Tale Heart? begins with the murderer raving about his sanity, and that he commits the crime not because of lunacy tho for his master?s ?Evil-Eye.? The man describes the eye as if it is a separate entity from the old man, and if it weren?t for the eye he would have nothing against his master. The eye beingness attached to the old man is just an unfortunate detail. In the following quote the man describes his feelings towards the Evil-Eye and what he decided to do about it ?Whenever it fell upon me, my line of credit ran cold and so by degrees-very gradually-I made up my mind to take the life of the old man, and thus rid myself ... ...d in some part of the phratry of each of the murderers. Also, in both of ?The Tell-Tale Heart? and ?The Cask of Amontillado? the killer?s guilty consciences eventually caused some sort of confession of their crimes. The man in the first story was driven mad into confessing from an imaginary heart beat, and the man in the latter is left to believe his conscience is what caused him to write his story confessing his crime. Both men in ?The Tell-Tale Heart? and ?The Black Cat? were extremely confident in their job covert the bodies, and almost bragging at their job at hiding the body. However, in all three stories the men were punished in some way. The first two stories I described had the law punishing the two men. The final story I described the man was never caught by the authorities for his crime, but instead he had to deal with the weight from his guilty conscience.

Teaching Race Explicitly in the Classroom Essay -- Education

Teaching Race Explicitly in the ClassroomMany literacy experts point out the fact that at the college level, bootleg students who attend all-black schools tend to be more successful than those care predominantly white schools. Even though these schools often lack resources and financial stability, they nonetheless become more high achieving black students than predominantly white schools. For instance, according to Fleming, black students attending Historically Black Universities and Colleges (HBUC) consecrate higher graduation rates than those attending predominately white institutions. Also, students who graduate from a HBUC and go on to attend predominantly white graduate schools do just as well as students who have graduated from predominantly white colleges (Fleming 1). What is it that black schools and black teachers have that produces academically successful black students? What approaches to learning can white teachers adopt from black teachers in order to maximize the lea rning of these students?Bell Hooks, author of Teaching to Transgress pedagogics as the Practice of Freedom, grew up in the South. As a younker child, she attended a segregated school, but then made the transition into a desegregated school later in her youth. Hooks believes that the education she received at the all-black school was far better than the education at the desegregated school. Hooks explains Almost all of our teachers at Booker T. working capital were black women. They were committed to nurturing our intellect so that we could become scholars, thinkers, and cultural workersblack folks who used our mindsWithin these segregated schools, black children who were deemed exceptional, gifted were given special careWhen we entered rac... ..., Jacqueline Jordan and James W. Fraser. Warm Demanders. Education Week 17(1998) n. pag. Online. Internet. 21 May 1998. Available FTPhttp//www.edweek.org/ew/vol-17/35irvine.h17Jones, LeAlan and Newman, Lloyd. Our America Life and Death on the South Side ofChicago. New York Washington Square Press Publication, 1997.Ladson-Billings, Gloria. The Dreamkeepers Successful Teachers of African AmericanChildren. San Francisco Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994.Smitherman, Geneva. The Blacker the Berry, The Sweeter the Juice. 1994.Tatum, Beverly. Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? NewYork Basic Books, 1997.Villegas, A. enlighten Failure and Cultural Mismatch Another View. The Urban Review,20.4 (1988) 253-265.Wellman, David. Portraits of White Racism. Cambridge Cambridge University Press,1977.

Auditory Localization Essay -- Hearing Sound Perception Essays

Auditory LocalizationAuditory localisation is the ability to recognize the view from which a serious is emanating (Goldstine, 2002). There atomic number 18 many practical reasons for studying auditory localization. For example, previous research states that visual cues are necessary in status a particular sound (Culling, 2000). However, blind people do not have the luxury of sight to help them aim a sound. Therefore, the ability to locate sound based only on auditory ability is important. It is also important to study different auditory processes. For example, when studying a way for a blind person to maneuver through an environment, it is helpful to know that people can most accurately locate sounds that happen directly in breast of them sounds that are far off, to the side, or behind the head are the least likely to be properly located (Goldstein, 2002).Three coordinate systems are utilize when attempting to locate a specific sound. The azimuth coordinate determines if a so und is located to the left or the right of a listener. The elevation coordinate differentiates amid sounds that are up or down relative to the listener. Finally, the distance coordinate determines how far away a sound is from the receiver (Goldstine, 2002). Different aspects of the coordinate systems are also essential to sound localization. For example, when identifying the azimuth in a sound, three acoustic cues are used spectral cues, interaural time differences (ITD), and interaural level differences (ILD) (Lorenzi, Gatehouse, & Lever, 1999). When dealing with sound localizaton, spectral cues are teh distribution of frequencies reaching teh ear. Brungart and Durlach (1999) (as seen in Shinn-Cunning, Santarelli, & Kopco, 1999) believed that as the ... ...Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 26 (6), 760-1769.Goldstein, E. (2002). Sensation and perception (Rev. ed.). Pacific Grove, CA Wadsworth-Thomsom Learning.Lorenzi, C., Gatehouse, S., & Lever, C. (1999). Sound localiz ation in noise in hearing impaired listeners. daybook of the Acoustical Society of America, 105 (6), 3454-3463.Lorenzi, C., Gatehouse, S., & Lever, C. (1999). Sound localization in noise in recipe hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105 (3), 1810-1820.McDonald, J., Teder-Salejarvi, W, & Hillyard, S. (2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature, 407, 906-907.Shinn-Cunningham, B., Santarelli, S., & Kopco, N. (1999). Tori of Confusion Binaural localization cues for sources within reach of the listener. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107 (3), 1627-1636.

The Hunchback Of Notre Dame :: essays research papers

     A gem that has s everal very visible flaws yet, with these flaws, "TheHunchback of Notre Dame" shines as the outflank from the Disney factory yet.For, at first, the company name and movie title didnt quite appear to sitwell together. You dont marry the king of novel Gothic lugubriousness (Mr. VictorHugo) with one of the worlds most beloved (if not biggest) animationcompanies and calculate the usual world population to be at the reception butexpect point Mr. Walt Disney to pat himself on the shoulder blade (or whatsleft of it) for allowing a hideous hunchback to be transformed into a GeneKelly-Incredible Hulk jazz group type of hero.     This "hero" is Quasimodo (Tom Hulce), which by the way means half-formed.Its about his distorted education (whoever teaches the alphabet usingabomination, blasphemy, condemnation, damnation and eternal damnation ?),his humiliation ( macrocosm laureled the king of fools), his first love and hisbig, big heart. Its about how our outward appearances should not matter(sounds familiar?). Its about believing in yourself but not beingself-righteous. And its about reliving the magic of Oscar-nominated"Beauty and the Beast", directed by Kirk Wise and Gary Trousdale (both,incidentally, were also responsible for "Hunchback".)     Wise and Trousdale obviously had a trance that didnt exactly conform toyour usual "and they lived happily ever later on" type of fairy tale. Theyemployed a lot of artistic license when rewriting the plot. It was, afterall, a cartoon but they didnt allow it to become an excuse to dissolve thepoignancy and tragedy into nothingness. Quasimodo did not get the girl.Nobody exactly lived "happily ever after". There was an amazing amount ofimplicit blood and violence. All that with Quasimodos unrestrainedoutburst near the end and the best animated celluloid archetype of thekiss contribute to the real emo tions that flowed from the characters.      Talking about being real, the drawings in "Hunchback" were simplybreathtaking. The two directors and chief artists actually made their wayto the known Notre Dame cathedral in Paris to experience first hand themagnificence and beauty of it. For ten whole days, they walked through,looked from, sat on, literally lived and breathed Notre Dame. The artistseven "swatched" some dirt just to match the colour The result was suchartistry that even George Lucas and Steven Spielberg would have wanted tocall their own. The scenes in the market place, the birds-eye view of thesteps of Notre Dame and beyond all left me gaping in wonder and sheerexcitement that such representation could be potential through animationits all thanks to computer animation.

Free Animal Farm Essay :: Animal Farm Essays

Animal Farm Essay     The name of the check is Animal Farm, which is written by George Orwell.This book is about a farm with animals who dislike the treatment, and overtakethe farm and overthrow the humans of the farm. As the revolution took place,two leaders came about. Their names were Snowball and nap, whose primary(prenominal)goal was to have nothing to do with humans, and bring communism into theirsociety.     " catnap was a large, rather fierce-looking Berkshire boar, the onlyone of those on the farm. He was not much of a talker, but with a reputationfor getting his own way" (Ch.2, P. 25).     "Snowball was a more vivacious pig than Napoleon, quicker in quarrel andmore inventive but did not have the character depth that Napoleon did" (Ch.2,Pgs. 24-25.) Snowball was the one with the ideas like the committees and thewindmill. He was a better intellect than Napoleon.     When all the animals helped kick Mr. Jones off the farm, Snowball ledthe animals to the store-shed and served out a double ration of corn toeverybody with two biscuits going to each of the dogs.     Napoleon on the other hand was very selfish. He stole milk that wasmeant for everybody and drank it all, and he stole apples. He doesnt careabout the work the animals do, just what would benefit him.     For example, Napoleon comes up with the building of the windmill thatwould supply electricity so they would not have to work as hard. Napoleon wasagainst this because he didnt come up with the idea. When Napoleon sees thatSnowball is gaining more baron with the speech of the windmill, Napoleon sendshis dogs to chase Snowball out of the farm. After Snowball was chased out ofthe farm, Napoleon gains more power by saying Snowball was a bad person. Hetold the animals that Snowball was with Mr. Jones from the starting. (Ch 6. P.72) "We will teach this miser able traitor that he cannot undo our work soeasily." He is now saying that Snowball was the one who ruined the windmill,even though it was his idea. He called him a traitor. And when Napoleoncouldnt do the trash talking, he displace squealer.     "For we know now, it is all written down in the secret documents that wehave found-that in reality he was trying to lure us to our doom" (Ch. 7 P. 80).He was telling all the animals that Snowball was a traitor and was with Mr.Jones, because of the Battle of the Cowshed.

Free Animal Farm Essay :: Animal Farm Essays

Animal Farm Essay     The name of the book is Animal Farm, which is write by George Orwell.This book is about a farm with animals who dislike the treatment, and overtakethe farm and overthrow the humans of the farm. As the revolution took place,two leaders came about. Their name were Snowball and snooze, whose maingoal was to have nothing to do with humans, and bring communism into theirsociety.     "Napoleon was a large, rather fierce-looking Berkshire boar, the onlyone of those on the farm. He was not much of a talker, but with a reputationfor getting his own way" (Ch.2, P. 25).     "Snowball was a more vivacious pig than Napoleon, quicker in speech andmore inventive but did not have the character depth that Napoleon did" (Ch.2,Pgs. 24-25.) Snowball was the one with the ideas like the committees and thewindmill. He was a better thinker than Napoleon.     When all the animals helped k ick Mr. Jones off the farm, Snowball ledthe animals to the store-shed and served out a double ration of corn toeverybody with two biscuits going to apiece of the dogs.     Napoleon on the other hand was very selfish. He stole milk that wasmeant for everybody and drank it all, and he stole apples. He doesnt careabout the work the animals do, fair what would benefit him.     For example, Napoleon progresss up with the building of the windmill thatwould supply electricity so they would not have to work as hard. Napoleon wasagainst this because he didnt come up with the idea. When Napoleon sees thatSnowball is gaining more power with the speech of the windmill, Napoleon sendshis dogs to chase Snowball out of the farm. After Snowball was chased out ofthe farm, Napoleon gains more power by saying Snowball was a bad person. Hetold the animals that Snowball was with Mr. Jones from the starting. (Ch 6. P.72) "We will teach this miserable traitor that he cannot reverse our work soeasily." He is now saying that Snowball was the one who ruined the windmill,even though it was his idea. He called him a traitor. And when Napoleoncouldnt do the rubbish talking, he sent squealer.     "For we know now, it is all written down in the secret documents that wehave found-that in reality he was trying to lure us to our doom" (Ch. 7 P. 80).He was telling all the animals that Snowball was a traitor and was with Mr.Jones, because of the Battle of the Cowshed.

Human Evolution Essay

Human phylogenesis is the growthary parade leading up to the appearing of mod humans. maculation it began with the coda plebeian stem of each(prenominal) life, the topic usu exclusivelyy covers only the maturationary history of order Primates, in particular the genus human race, and the emersion of Homo sapiens as a perspicuous species of hominids (or great apes). The larn of human growing involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies return that primates diverged from early(a) mammals roughly 85 cardinal days pastne in the ripe Cretaceous period, and the early fossils appear in the Paleocene, rough 55 one one trillion zillion meg million old age past.2 The family family family family Hominidae diverged from the family Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million days ago, and nearly 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (or angutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the soonest bipedal Hominin is considered to be both Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a wide bipedal, approach somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged nearly the same time, astir(predicate) 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin whitethorn be our pass away overlap ascendent with them. The early bipedals eventu everyy evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary subroutine leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last uncouth source of all life, the topic ordinarily covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the growing of Homo sapiens as a decided species of hominids (or great apes). The involve of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology , archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies submit that primates diverged from other mammals virtually 85 million years ago in the advanced Cretaceous period, and the early fossils appear in the Paleocene, somewhat 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and some 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earlier bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, climax somewhat later.The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals finally evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last green ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a clean-cut species of hominids (or great apes). The force field of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrori n, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, overture somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later.The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species o f hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals event ually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates d iverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evo lutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes).The study of human evolutio n involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 mill ion years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years a go, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes).The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatol ogy, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appear ance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipit hecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them.The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, a round 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or gre at apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes).The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history o f primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 m illion years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.Human evolution is the evolutionary process leading up to the appearance of modern humans. While it began with the last common ancestor of all life, the topic usually covers only the evolutionary history of primates, in particular the genus Homo, and the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of hominids (or great apes). The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, evolutionary psychology, embryology and genetics.1 Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.2 The family Hominidae diverged from the Hylobatidae (Gibbon) family 15-20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae (orangutans), diverged from the Hominidae family.3 Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominin is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The gorilla and chimpanzee diverged around the same time, about 4-6 million years ago, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with them. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the australopithecines and later the genus Homo.

Blogging Digital Media And Society Series Essay

Jill Walker Rettberg clean edition Blogging digital media and society series can be described as a key apply in an emerging field. Blogging has come to be associated as a landmark in the current social cyber studies and even more. Blogging is all about the way at presents favourite culture has become an important element in large magnitude changes in how culture is produced. With her allow, Jill digs into the deep and broad of blogging to expose the proofreader the real meaning of what is involved in blogging as the evidence and driver of a shift in epochal culture (Rettberg, 2014).Jills expertness in ensuring that she reaches out to the right audience and puts the points on blogging across is enhanced by experience. Being a prolific blogger herself, Jill uses her experience as a blogger in pointing out the various issues to her audience. Jill also utilizes examination which is enhanced by use of an experts eye of a communications researcher with experience to light upon the historical, psychological, social and political meaning of the blogging initiative. Borrowing from various disciplines, it is evident of her good understanding on the blogging issue and its impact. The other strong point in her create verbally is the fact that she brings and uses various disciplines such as media studies, marketing, ethnology, literary studies, sociology and journalism into an excellent exploratory framework (Rettberg, 2014).Jills book expands blogging into a wider context of the decline in print culture to the emerging trends. The updated and revised edition provides a good study of the now each and every day phenomenon placing it in a theoretical, contemporaneous and historical context. The use of the most recent of the researches and emergences in the blogging world is taken care of with an analysis of the new tools for visual blogging and micro blogging (Rettberg, 2014).In the book, Jill discusses the changing trends where in the current times blogs are bei ng integrated into the mainstream social media ecology. This helps to show the reader the direction the blogging element is taking in the formation and continuation of popular culture. Jill notes that the comments and the links from social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook hold up become more important than networks between blogs which was important five years ago. Jill also questions the new trend where there is a shift towards increased corporate control and commercialization of blogs (Rettberg, 2014).The cultural shift has also seen its share of influence from blogging as Jill illustrates apply examples. Jill delves into the analysis of how the current smart phones equipped with cameras together with the social media has led to the shift towards more emphasis on the visual aspects in the blogs with the use of prowess and photographs being in the foreground. Jill puts in a convincing analysis of how blogging together with related genres have come to change the worl d of communication and media (Rettberg, 2014).The design of the book is in such a way that each of the chapters is a self-sufficient review of areas in blogging which makes the structure repetitive across the work. The book is more equal for beginners or anyone with an interest in blogging as Jill puts the chapters in a loose connection to blogging. Though Jill has borrowed from many disciplines to help the reader in understanding the dissimilar aspects of blogging, there is some diversion, however when the discussion shifts from blogging as a phenomenon into the related and convergent forms like the social networking sites. There are lengthy discussions of the various sites such as MySpace and Facebook which though put with the right intention in mind, they do not achieve this as there is no clear elaboration to the reader how this relates to the overall topics (Rettberg, 2014).Walkers work begins by tackling the question of what a blog is. She starts with an introduction to the history of online text based communication. She then moves on to the development of blogging tools such as Blogger. Walker develops a shred understanding of material aspects in blogging. An interesting section also discusses blogs as genre and medium which is a distinction that is not addressed directly most of the time. In From Bards to Blogs, Walter takes the discussion on the blogging place within media culture and the shift from one-to- many towards many-to- many. Walter positions the internet as a counterpoint to Platos complaint of a written text being unresponsive. Walker shares the view that there is potential for interactivity between authors of blog posts, the blog post itself and the reader in blog comments (Rettberg, 2014).Also of particular interest is the chapter Citizen Journalist? where Walker puts her focus on the three ways in which blogging intersects with conventional journalism. There are bloggers acting as journalists, the bloggers who report on mainstream med ia and the bloggers giving first-hand reports on ongoing events. Walker goes ahead to discuss bloggers as the chance to observe big historical events. Her example of Kaye D. Trammell account on Hurricane Katrina is meant to show how blogs can be used as sources of information by both the public and volume media however understudied. This is an avenue that can be used for succeeding(a) works in blogging (Rettberg, 2014).Walker also discusses how blogs have expanded to various forms of narratives in Blogs as narratives She gives an account of the three forms of narratives namely the goal-oriented narrative, ongoing narration and fragmented narratives. In the same chapter she evaluates the ways in which blogs can be used as a means of self exploration with one discovering their strengths and what they can do best to contribute to the society (Rettberg, 2014).Walker finishes the book off with a review of the future of blogs and the future of social media. In the chapter, Walker also touches on the use of language, privacy government access and control each of which one gets the feeling that they could be well covered in a different book each on its own. An addition of some scholarly works using quantitative methods would have added some balance to the various discussions such as the one on protypical blog and blogger. Another limitation in Walkers book is that there is a small number of scholarly works cited on bloggers and blogging (Rettberg, 2014).In general Walker provides a popular view on blogging culture and blogs and steers away(predicate) from in-depth analysis and critical discussion. The text however is a good introductory resource for both non-academic and academic audiences (Rettberg, 2014).ReferenceRettberg, J. W. (2014).Blogging.Source document

Sainsburys SWOT

The aim of this report is to analysis the financial achievement of J Sainsbury plc by compare several proportionalitys, in the view of an investor who seeking unyielding term investment. Four sections will be illustrated, the background of Sainsbury, 10 ratio analysis, a suggestion of whether the high society is worth to invest and a limitation of authentic financial statements and ratio analysis. J Sainsbury plc is the third largest chain company of supermarkets in the UK, which is generally known as Sainsburys. It takes over around 16. % in the UK supermarket sector and besides has interests in property and banking (Bloomberg, 2011). Sainsburys was established by John James Sainsbury and his wife in London in 1869, and got a fasting development during the twee era. SWOT analysis As peerless of the leading retailers in the UK, Sainsburys has a market share of around 16. 1% and serves over 19 one thousand million customers per week (J Sainsbury plc annual report, 2011).It has strengths in offering various services such as internet-based home delivery shopping services, which touch out to nearly 90% UK household. Strong presence in the UK imparts distinct competitive advantage and favorable market dynamics for Sainsburys, which facilitates revenue and business expansion growth prospects (Datamonitor, 2010). It also has a significant advantage of providing portfolio renders that enables the company to have an change magnitude sale. Besides, the company has a strong completive performance with offering discounts, compared to other retailer chains such as ASDA. However, Sainsburys has several weaknesses as well.One of them would be the limitation of market share. The company has generated all of its sales from UK, while the competitors, such as Tesco and Wal-Mart, have more than equitable revenue generation from international operations, including areas of central Europe, Asia, and the US. They also have increased revenue in other industries like Tesc o Bank, however, Sainsbury provided has involved in retail industry (Datamonitor, 2010). Other weaknesses would be raising inflation and credit crisis rooted from the global economic showdown in recent years.As for some opportunities in the future, besides strategic shift in focus on expansion in emerging countries, the growth potential in the online distribution channel gets a jump. The potential market of the organic food in the UK has gotten an increase in recent years. The UK organic food market grew by 3. 5% in 2010 to reach a value of $2,968. 3 million. By 2015, the market is forecast to have a value of $4,180. 8 million, an increase of 40. 8% since 2010. The survey from Datamonitor said.As for Sainsburys, it is one of the largest companies of organic food market in the UK. The company markets more than 800 organic food product lines, with major growth about grocery, frozen foods and fresh meat. Threats ceaselessly follow with opportunities. Sainsburys has to face competit ion from other major retailers like M&S and Tesco which have substantial operating base with Sainsburys (Datamonitor, 2010). The company might have to increase its cost for advertising or reduce prices because of such a competitive situation.However, it will cause declined gain grounds and cannot get a great development for Sainsburys. The opportunities of Sainsburys growth might be limited by declined net income and sales growth Relevant ratios analysis The current ratio of Sainsburys has decreased from 66% in 2010 to 58% in 2011, resulted mainly from enhancive current liabilities. It is evident to ascertain that the number of trade and other payables increased from 2,466 million pounds to 2,597 million pounds from the data of financial position.It might be because of global financial crisis of 2010 and purchasing 24 stores from the Co-operative (BBC, 2010). In short, it seems to decline the ability of debt paying. As for the flying ratio, which assumes that inventory is not av ailable as a part of the asset base to meeting the demands of immediate liabilities, there was a decrease from 41% to 31% between 2010 and 2011. It is fairer to consider investments for measuring the ability of meeting liabilities when combining the current ratio and the acid-test ratio.According to these figures, the funding liquidity of J Sainsbury plc is an indicator of plain performance in liquidity, because the data of current ratio is lour than 1 and that for quick ratio is lower than 0. 5. For instance, New Bristol Sainsburys store is unstable in local business, and the watch said the negative impact of the store, on Bristol City Football Clubs ground, would outweigh any benefits (BBC, 2011). The gearing ratio displays the level of risks when investments happen.From the financial report of Sainsburys, it has an inconspicuous blow over from 47% in 2010 to 43% in 2011 because the total shareholders equity got an increase from 4,966 million pounds to 5,424 million pounds. It looks that investors have to get lower profit margin, but it provided lower risks of investments and investors because higher gearing means a larger proportion of profits are used to pay interest on loans, instead of being reinvested or paid to shareholders. Therefore, it might be a good situation for most investors.In addition, Sainsburys will create 20,000 sweet jobs over three years and the new jobs, which come after the creation of 13,000 jobs created in the last two years, will be at supermarkets and convenience stores across the UK(BBC, 2011). Most investors become more footsure for Sainsburys. The operation capacity of Sainsburys can be reflected by the operating profit margin, which was 3. 56% in 2010 and 4. 03% in 2011. It is obvious to find that the ability of profit taking in Sainsburys went up between 2010 and 2011.The reason for this might be higher sales from 19,964 million pounds to 21,102 million pounds and higher profits. It is easy to find that from the news, In May 2010 Justin King announced that Sainsburys pledged to involve each of its 850 stores in the promotion of the Paralympics after the multimillion-pound deal with the London Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games to be the main sponsor of the London 2012 Paralympic games (SkyNews, 2010) In terms of the return on capital employed ratio, it was 6. 4% in 2010 and 7. 47% in 2011. It is a result of increased total assets and some increasing in non-current assets such as property, plant and equipment between 2010 and 2011. According to the ROCE, the ability of value creation in J Sainsbury plc is very strong and fine management could be expressed. The asset turnover ratio plays a significant role in the target system of financial analysis. In the financial results of Sainsburys, it has a slight increase from 184% in 2010 to 185% in 2011.It means that the operating efficiency of total assets and marketing capacity in Sainsburys has become better, and then the compa ny generated more profits. For example, Sainsburys plans to open Whitchurch store and not only offer more jobs, but also get more profits (BBC, 2010). Conclusion In conclusion, J Sainsbury plc gets a great development in industries of supermarkets in UK, and it has an increase in its sales and higher profits. On the other hand, Sainsburys has utilized assets effectively and efficiently and had a strong management.However, compared to other competitors such as Tesco and Asda, it is lack of enough evident advantages such as profits of fast growth and strong capital turnover. The stable profit and lower risks can be provided if there are not better options. Limitation This report of J Sainsbury plc is limited by some factors such as quality of financial statements and inflation. Firstly, although all ratios from this report are based on financial statements of J Sainsbury plc annual report, some data which is excluded from usual financial statements such as human assets and internally- generated goodwill and brands is absent.Secondly, J Sainsbury plc annual report is between 2010 and 2011 so that the record from ratios only is a snapshot of the business from 2010 to 2011. Thirdly, inflation is one of the most significant factors which affect the veracity and authenticity of this report. In recent years, the rate of inflation has kept up because of energy sources so that there is a time lag and it might cause the data of same parts in different years to display different trends.

In the Time of the Butterflies Essay

Courage is valued among the char play arrangeers, and they display it in varying amounts. Among altogether the sisters Minerva shows the most courage. First she starts off by wanting to be a lawyer and she is not algophobic of speaking her mind. She goes to a embarkment school where she meets a girl who is against Trujillo and learns how bad Trujillo re eachy is. This is when she begins to start acting climblious. at a time she is older, Minervas family is invited to a party at Trujillos palace where she does things that most people would never pull down dare to think of doing.Minerva plays a game with Trujillo which she wins and gets her take released from arrest and gets her into law school. In law school, she joins a stem that is speaking out against Trujillo. A lot of courage is needed to complete the tasks that Minerva completed and with these tasks she highly-developed a love-hate relationship with Trujillo making some of the tasks easier to complete. In the end three ou t of the four sister have a lot courage and commence a symbol for many people. The three sisters are killed, but by who they were killed is actually controversial.The sisters are all aware of their cowardice as they perceive it, and eyepatch they sometimes fight for courage, in some cases they simply accept their cowardice, except for Minerva who shows courage at all times. Growing up Minerva was almost the bravest out of all the sisters. She was not afraid to speak her mind, nonetheless if they might be spies around. She would say things about Trujillo that would make everyone jump and ask if she was trying to get everyone killed. She always cherished to be free and make a difference in the world.Government and politics were not a coif for women. A womanhoods place was to follow her husband and be loyal to her husband. Minerva, on the other hand, wanted to be a lawyer. In reply, her mother comments, Just what we need, skirts in the law Minerva argues, however, It is reaso nable what this country needs Its about time we women had a voice in running our country. Her sisters had always worried about Minerva and her bravery because politics were gloomy business and someone was always getting killed because they said the wrong thing and made Trujillo unhappy.Minerva did not care about the risks about being a woman in politics, she cared about equality and making a difference in the friar preacher Re commonplace. She thought she would get some freedom if she left home and went to a boarding school and thats exactly what she did. In the boarding school, Minerva met a girl whose family was killed by Trujillo and she absolutely hated him for that. This girl told Minerva about all the foul things that Trujillo has done and this is when Minerva starts learning more about Trujillo. This is withal when you start seeing Minerva start becoming rebellious.This is shown when there is a class going on, but Minerva is not there instead she is on a balcony above th e class burbleing to the girl who told her about Trujillo. This boarding school is also where she meets Trujillo for the first time and also shows bravery here. The school is performing a play for Trujillo when Minervas friend lifts her arrow and top dogs it at Trujillo. Minerva risks herself to stop her friend from shooting the arrow. It was a small act of courage, but its the small acts that lead to the greater ones.Once Minerva graduates from boarding school and returns home, shortly after the family receives a party invitation from Trujillo. Once inside the castle, Minerva gets seated at a special table which was a request from Trujillo and once Trujillo arrives in the ballroom where the party is being held, he asks Minerva to dance. While dancing, Trujillo tells her how he never forgot her from the boarding school and how he thinks that she is very beautiful. Trujillo slowly moves his hands down her back and onto her buttocks and that is when she backs up and slaps him.No one would ever dare slap Trujillo, even after an act like this. This is a great act of disgrace and Minerva was very brave for standing her ground and slapping him. Everyone looked down on her with shock for what she did and her family was very mad and panicked and left immediately. Her family was very mad because slapping Trujillo could get the livelong family killed because that was an act of rebellion. Minerva explains to her family that she did not slap him as a sign of rebellion, but because he touched her buttocks making her very uncomfortable.The family then was not as mad, but they were still very worried to what was going to happen to them. At this point of the movie, Minerva is still the one with the most courage while the rest of the family is accepting their cowardice. It took a lot of courage for Minerva to slap Trujillo in such a public place and at his own party. She knew there would be consequences to this, but she was still not afraid. Soon after the party soldiers ca me to the Mirabel household looking for the develop. They said they were victorious him in for quest oning, but everyone knew that he was being arrested and they did not know when they would see him again. Once the soldiers left, Minerva smashed the picture of Trujillo that was hung in their house because of her anger. This is another act of courage because if there are spies around they can come in and take Minerva away and kill her for doing that. ANother act of courage is when Minerva goes to the castle of Trujillo to talk to him about releasing her father. Trujillo came up with a game that they would play.They had to roll dice and who ever got the higher number won. The deal they made was if he won her father would not be released, but if she won the father would be released and she would be allowed to go to law school. Women were not allowed to go to law school in the Dominican Republic, so asking Trujillo to let her attend was another act of courage. Minerva ended up winning and Trujillo break the deal that he made with Minerva. The father was released and Minerva presently left to law school. At this point of the movie, Minervas sister began to show courage too.In law school, Minerva joins a group that goes against Trujillo and comes up with different plans and ideas to rebel against him, for example hanging up posters around town. One day one of Minervas sisters runs away from home and comes to Minerva. This is brave because women were needed at home and it was wild for them to travel by themselves. Also leaving home with not telling anyone would leave the parents worrying about their daughter. Minerva tells her sister to go home because its a bad time and not a place for her sister to be, trying to protect her.Leaving her sister met a guy who was part of the rebellious group and he got her to be in it as well. Now this is sister is being brave because now she is going against Trujillo as well putting the family in even more danger. Soon the third sister is also in the group and the three sisters become the leaders of this group. They become known as, Las mariposa tulips. The group is soon caught and everyone in it is arrested. When the sisters look out a small hole in the wall, they see a flag with butterflies on it, representing them and this gives them more hope.Soon the sisters are released from jail by Trujillo. When Minerva arrives at home, Trujillo is there waiting for her. He tells her that she has a lot of courage because everytime he does something nice for her because he likes her, she instead turns her back and does something back and is not afraid to pay the consequences. She then asks Trujillo to release hers and her sisters husbands from jail and Trujillo says he will.The sisters go visit their husbands and give them the good news, but on the way there they get halt by soldiers. They get taken out of the car and into the cornfields where hey get slaughtered. This ending is very controversial because it was a group of men that killed them, but after all their courage and everything they did for the country, who would want to harm them? Also could have Trujillo ordered their death even if he loved Minerva and did everything she asked for? This part of the story may never be known. The movie begins with only Minerva being the brave one, but ends with three out of four sisters being the brave ones and fighting for what they believed was right. The sisters stopped accepting their cowardice and displayed their courage.As she was being marched down the hall, a voice from one of the cells called out,Mariposa does not belong to herself alone. She belongs to Quisqueya Then everyone was beating on the bars calling out, Viva La Mariposa Tears came to my eyes. Something big and powerful spread its wings inside me. Courage, I told myself. And this time, I felt it. This is a quote from the movie and book that shows that although Minerva has been courageous the whole time, she did not feel it until s he was leaving the jail. Everything that Minerva did in her lifetime, built her courage up and made her stronger each time.